J Chem Inf Model - Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.


{ bind(1733) structur(1185) ligand(1036) }
{ error(1145) method(1030) estim(1020) }
{ model(2341) predict(2261) use(1141) }
{ model(2656) set(1616) predict(1553) }
{ use(1733) differ(960) four(931) }
{ process(1125) use(805) approach(778) }
{ can(774) often(719) complex(702) }
{ sampl(1606) size(1419) use(1276) }
{ measur(2081) correl(1212) valu(896) }
{ first(2504) two(1366) second(1323) }
{ high(1669) rate(1365) level(1280) }
{ inform(2794) health(2639) internet(1427) }
{ result(1111) use(1088) new(759) }
{ activ(1452) weight(1219) physic(1104) }
{ problem(2511) optim(1539) algorithm(950) }
{ algorithm(1844) comput(1787) effici(935) }
{ analysi(2126) use(1163) compon(1037) }
{ drug(1928) target(777) effect(648) }
{ case(1353) use(1143) diagnosi(1136) }
{ research(1085) discuss(1038) issu(1018) }
{ compound(1573) activ(1297) structur(1058) }
{ framework(1458) process(801) describ(734) }
{ data(1714) softwar(1251) tool(1186) }
{ howev(809) still(633) remain(590) }
{ can(981) present(881) function(850) }
{ method(2212) result(1239) propos(1039) }
{ detect(2391) sensit(1101) algorithm(908) }
{ model(3404) distribut(989) bayesian(671) }
{ imag(1057) registr(996) error(939) }
{ take(945) account(800) differ(722) }
{ treatment(1704) effect(941) patient(846) }
{ method(1557) propos(1049) approach(1037) }
{ design(1359) user(1324) use(1319) }
{ method(984) reconstruct(947) comput(926) }
{ system(1050) medic(1026) inform(1018) }
{ model(3480) simul(1196) paramet(876) }
{ ehr(2073) health(1662) electron(1139) }
{ cost(1906) reduc(1198) effect(832) }
{ intervent(3218) particip(2042) group(1664) }
{ use(976) code(926) identifi(902) }
{ imag(1947) propos(1133) code(1026) }
{ data(1737) use(1416) pattern(1282) }
{ system(1976) rule(880) can(841) }
{ sequenc(1873) structur(1644) protein(1328) }
{ method(1219) similar(1157) match(930) }
{ featur(3375) classif(2383) classifi(1994) }
{ imag(2830) propos(1344) filter(1198) }
{ network(2748) neural(1063) input(814) }
{ imag(2675) segment(2577) method(1081) }
{ patient(2315) diseas(1263) diabet(1191) }
{ studi(2440) review(1878) systemat(933) }
{ motion(1329) object(1292) video(1091) }
{ assess(1506) score(1403) qualiti(1306) }
{ surgeri(1148) surgic(1085) robot(1054) }
{ chang(1828) time(1643) increas(1301) }
{ learn(2355) train(1041) set(1003) }
{ concept(1167) ontolog(924) domain(897) }
{ clinic(1479) use(1117) guidelin(835) }
{ extract(1171) text(1153) clinic(932) }
{ control(1307) perform(991) simul(935) }
{ model(2220) cell(1177) simul(1124) }
{ care(1570) inform(1187) nurs(1089) }
{ general(901) number(790) one(736) }
{ search(2224) databas(1162) retriev(909) }
{ featur(1941) imag(1645) propos(1176) }
{ data(3963) clinic(1234) research(1004) }
{ studi(1410) differ(1259) use(1210) }
{ risk(3053) factor(974) diseas(938) }
{ perform(999) metric(946) measur(919) }
{ import(1318) role(1303) understand(862) }
{ visual(1396) interact(850) tool(830) }
{ perform(1367) use(1326) method(1137) }
{ studi(1119) effect(1106) posit(819) }
{ blood(1257) pressur(1144) flow(957) }
{ spatial(1525) area(1432) region(1030) }
{ record(1888) medic(1808) patient(1693) }
{ health(3367) inform(1360) care(1135) }
{ monitor(1329) mobil(1314) devic(1160) }
{ state(1844) use(1261) util(961) }
{ research(1218) medic(880) student(794) }
{ patient(2837) hospit(1953) medic(668) }
{ data(2317) use(1299) case(1017) }
{ age(1611) year(1155) adult(843) }
{ medic(1828) order(1363) alert(1069) }
{ signal(2180) analysi(812) frequenc(800) }
{ group(2977) signific(1463) compar(1072) }
{ gene(2352) biolog(1181) express(1162) }
{ data(3008) multipl(1320) sourc(1022) }
{ activ(1138) subject(705) human(624) }
{ time(1939) patient(1703) rate(768) }
{ patient(1821) servic(1111) care(1106) }
{ use(2086) technolog(871) perceiv(783) }
{ health(1844) social(1437) communiti(874) }
{ structur(1116) can(940) graph(676) }
{ cancer(2502) breast(956) screen(824) }
{ implement(1333) system(1263) develop(1122) }
{ survey(1388) particip(1329) question(1065) }
{ estim(2440) model(1874) function(577) }
{ decis(3086) make(1611) patient(1517) }
{ method(1969) cluster(1462) data(1082) }


It is of great interest in modern drug design to accurately calculate the free energies of protein-ligand or nucleic acid-ligand binding. MM-PBSA (molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area) and MM-GBSA (molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area) have gained popularity in this field. For both methods, the conformational entropy, which is usually calculated through normal-mode analysis (NMA), is needed to calculate the absolute binding free energies. Unfortunately, NMA is computationally demanding and becomes a bottleneck of the MM-PB/GBSA-NMA methods. In this work, we have developed a fast approach to estimate the conformational entropy based upon solvent accessible surface area calculations. In our approach, the conformational entropy of a molecule, S, can be obtained by summing up the contributions of all atoms, no matter they are buried or exposed. Each atom has two types of surface areas, solvent accessible surface area (SAS) and buried SAS (BSAS). The two types of surface areas are weighted to estimate the contribution of an atom to S. Atoms having the same atom type share the same weight and a general parameter k is applied to balance the contributions of the two types of surface areas. This entropy model was parametrized using a large set of small molecules for which their conformational entropies were calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G* level taking the solvent effect into account. The weighted solvent accessible surface area (WSAS) model was extensively evaluated in three tests. For convenience, TS values, the product of temperature T and conformational entropy S, were calculated in those tests. T was always set to 298.15 K through the text. First of all, good correlations were achieved between WSAS TS and NMA TS for 44 protein or nucleic acid systems sampled with molecular dynamics simulations (10 snapshots were collected for postentropy calculations): the mean correlation coefficient squares (R?) was 0.56. As to the 20 complexes, the TS changes upon binding; TS values were also calculated, and the mean R? was 0.67 between NMA and WSAS. In the second test, TS values were calculated for 12 proteins decoy sets (each set has 31 conformations) generated by the Rosetta software package. Again, good correlations were achieved for all decoy sets: the mean, maximum, and minimum of R? were 0.73, 0.89, and 0.55, respectively. Finally, binding free energies were calculated for 6 protein systems (the numbers of inhibitors range from 4 to 18) using four scoring functions. Compared to the measured binding free energies, the mean R? of the six protein systems were 0.51, 0.47, 0.40, and 0.43 for MM-GBSA-WSAS, MM-GBSA-NMA, MM-PBSA-WSAS, and MM-PBSA-NMA, respectively. The mean rms errors of prediction were 1.19, 1.24, 1.41, 1.29 kcal/mol for the four scoring functions, correspondingly. Therefore, the two scoring functions employing WSAS achieved a comparable prediction performance to that of the scoring functions using NMA. It should be emphasized that no minimization was performed prior to the WSAS calculation in the last test. Although WSAS is not as rigorous as physical models such as quasi-harmonic analysis and thermodynamic integration (TI), it is computationally very efficient as only surface area calculation is involved and no structural minimization is required. Moreover, WSAS has achieved a comparable performance to normal-mode analysis. We expect that this model could find its applications in the fields like high throughput screening (HTS), molecular docking, and rational protein design. In those fields, efficiency is crucial since there are a large number of compounds, docking poses, or protein models to be evaluated. A list of acronyms and abbreviations used in this work is provided for quick reference.

Resumo Limpo

great interest modern drug design accur calcul free energi proteinligand nucleic acidligand bind mmpbsa molecular mechan poissonboltzmann surfac area mmgbsa molecular mechan general born surfac area gain popular field method conform entropi usual calcul normalmod analysi nma need calcul absolut bind free energi unfortun nma comput demand becom bottleneck mmpbgbsanma method work develop fast approach estim conform entropi base upon solvent access surfac area calcul approach conform entropi molecul s can obtain sum contribut atom matter buri expos atom two type surfac area solvent access surfac area sas buri sas bsas two type surfac area weight estim contribut atom s atom atom type share weight general paramet k appli balanc contribut two type surfac area entropi model parametr use larg set small molecul conform entropi calcul blypg level take solvent effect account weight solvent access surfac area wsas model extens evalu three test conveni ts valu product temperatur t conform entropi s calcul test t alway set k text first good correl achiev wsas ts nma ts protein nucleic acid system sampl molecular dynam simul snapshot collect postentropi calcul mean correl coeffici squar r complex ts chang upon bind ts valu also calcul mean r nma wsas second test ts valu calcul protein decoy set set conform generat rosetta softwar packag good correl achiev decoy set mean maximum minimum r respect final bind free energi calcul protein system number inhibitor rang use four score function compar measur bind free energi mean r six protein system mmgbsawsa mmgbsanma mmpbsawsa mmpbsanma respect mean rms error predict kcalmol four score function correspond therefor two score function employ wsas achiev compar predict perform score function use nma emphas minim perform prior wsas calcul last test although wsas rigor physic model quasiharmon analysi thermodynam integr ti comput effici surfac area calcul involv structur minim requir moreov wsas achiev compar perform normalmod analysi expect model find applic field like high throughput screen hts molecular dock ration protein design field effici crucial sinc larg number compound dock pose protein model evalu list acronym abbrevi use work provid quick refer

Resumos Similares

J Chem Inf Model - PHOENIX: a scoring function for affinity prediction derived using high-resolution crystal structures and calorimetry measurements. ( 0,907572251296599 )
J Chem Inf Model - Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization. ( 0,901778545345462 )
J Chem Inf Model - Calculation of the solvation free energy of neutral and ionic molecules in diverse solvents. ( 0,900007249713985 )
J Chem Inf Model - Molecular modeling study of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. Molecular dynamics simulations, quantum mechanical calculations, and experimental corroboration. ( 0,897055642548082 )
J Chem Inf Model - Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions. ( 0,888017051565764 )
J Chem Inf Model - CHARMM-GUI Ligand Binder for absolute binding free energy calculations and its application. ( 0,886492357557375 )
J Chem Inf Model - Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules. ( 0,886408054852785 )
J Chem Inf Model - Combined application of cheminformatics- and physical force field-based scoring functions improves binding affinity prediction for CSAR data sets. ( 0,881847187445632 )
J Chem Inf Model - Including explicit water molecules as part of the protein structure in MM/PBSA calculations. ( 0,877399936873438 )
J Chem Inf Model - Application of the docking program SOL for CSAR benchmark. ( 0,875121545021231 )
J Chem Inf Model - Molecular dynamics simulation, free energy calculation and structure-based 3D-QSAR studies of B-RAF kinase inhibitors. ( 0,872937964109351 )
J Chem Inf Model - Strategies for improved modeling of GPCR-drug complexes: blind predictions of serotonin receptors bound to ergotamine. ( 0,871008687650586 )
J Chem Inf Model - Evaluation of several two-step scoring functions based on linear interaction energy, effective ligand size, and empirical pair potentials for prediction of protein-ligand binding geometry and free energy. ( 0,869475639339535 )
J Chem Inf Model - Structure-based multiscale approach for identification of interaction partners of PDZ domains. ( 0,865631588386858 )
J Chem Inf Model - Application of binding free energy calculations to prediction of binding modes and affinities of MDM2 and MDMX inhibitors. ( 0,863296795266437 )
J Chem Inf Model - Experimental-like affinity constants and enantioselectivity estimates from flexible docking. ( 0,861810005464828 )
J Chem Inf Model - Computational modeling of the catalytic mechanism of human placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP). ( 0,859824849965504 )
J Chem Inf Model - MM/GBSA binding energy prediction on the PDBbind data set: successes, failures, and directions for further improvement. ( 0,858397766221766 )
J Chem Inf Model - Accuracy assessment and automation of free energy calculations for drug design. ( 0,85559522269824 )
J Chem Inf Model - Computational insight into small molecule inhibition of cyclophilins. ( 0,854654831515254 )
J Chem Inf Model - Protein-protein binding sites prediction by 3D structural similarities. ( 0,853344615560141 )
J Chem Inf Model - Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition by ketoconazole: tackling the problem of ligand cooperativity using molecular dynamics simulations and free-energy calculations. ( 0,849722455633655 )
J Chem Inf Model - Computation of binding energies including their enthalpy and entropy components for protein-ligand complexes using support vector machines. ( 0,849512675452685 )
J Chem Inf Model - Thermodynamics of fragment binding. ( 0,846915731900856 )
J Chem Inf Model - AADS--an automated active site identification, docking, and scoring protocol for protein targets based on physicochemical descriptors. ( 0,845688003098719 )
J Chem Inf Model - Ligand Identification Scoring Algorithm (LISA). ( 0,844180586447543 )
J Chem Inf Model - Computational comparison of imidazoline association with the I2 binding site in human monoamine oxidases. ( 0,843942909852918 )
J Chem Inf Model - Conformational free energy modeling of druglike molecules by metadynamics in the WHIM space. ( 0,843578496032044 )
J Chem Inf Model - Global free energy scoring functions based on distance-dependent atom-type pair descriptors. ( 0,842691368134733 )
J Chem Inf Model - Molecular docking and competitive binding study discovered different binding modes of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 inhibitors. ( 0,840093452602191 )
J Chem Inf Model - Computational analysis of human OGA structure in complex with PUGNAc and NAG-thiazoline derivatives. ( 0,839085353086754 )
J Chem Inf Model - Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark. ( 0,839054116870535 )
J Chem Inf Model - Ligand aligning method for molecular docking: alignment of property-weighted vectors. ( 0,838263504901744 )
J Chem Inf Model - Inclusion of multiple fragment types in the site identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) approach. ( 0,837248298407252 )
J Chem Inf Model - Postprocessing of docked protein-ligand complexes using implicit solvation models. ( 0,83720632577998 )
J Chem Inf Model - The assembly-inducing laulimalide/peloruside a binding site on tubulin: molecular modeling and biochemical studies with [?H]peloruside A. ( 0,836316962179181 )
J Chem Inf Model - New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability. ( 0,835599621876878 )
J Chem Inf Model - Combining solvent thermodynamic profiles with functionality maps of the Hsp90 binding site to predict the displacement of water molecules. ( 0,835479070458299 )
J Chem Inf Model - Structural and energetic analysis of 2-aminobenzimidazole inhibitors in complex with the hepatitis C virus IRES RNA using molecular dynamics simulations. ( 0,834598022882974 )
J Chem Inf Model - Ligand binding site identification by higher dimension molecular dynamics. ( 0,834401788891142 )
J Chem Inf Model - Binding conformation of 2-oxoamide inhibitors to group IVA cytosolic phospholipase A2 determined by molecular docking combined with molecular dynamics. ( 0,833030216758864 )
J Chem Inf Model - Ligand binding mode prediction by docking: mdm2/mdmx inhibitors as a case study. ( 0,832102925825111 )
Comput Biol Chem - Computer modeling of the dynamic properties of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit. ( 0,829382216550177 )
J Chem Inf Model - Key binding and susceptibility of NS3/4A serine protease inhibitors against hepatitis C virus. ( 0,828849090251955 )
J Chem Inf Model - A robust force field based method for calculating conformational energies of charged drug-like molecules. ( 0,827529961641285 )
J Chem Inf Model - Molecular dynamics simulations of CXCL-8 and its interactions with a receptor peptide, heparin fragments, and sulfated linked cyclitols. ( 0,827080771531636 )
J Chem Inf Model - Significant enhancement of docking sensitivity using implicit ligand sampling. ( 0,826810780621458 )
J Chem Inf Model - Structural insight into the unique binding properties of pyridylethanol(phenylethyl)amine inhibitor in human CYP51. ( 0,825888799031251 )
J Chem Inf Model - Molecular dynamic behavior and binding affinity of flavonoid analogues to the cyclin dependent kinase 6/cyclin D complex. ( 0,825877662523109 )
J Chem Inf Model - Ensemble-based docking using biased molecular dynamics. ( 0,825275714178668 )
J Chem Inf Model - Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA. ( 0,824420467777201 )
J Chem Inf Model - Subtype selectivity of dopamine receptor ligands: insights from structure and ligand-based methods. ( 0,823468929465419 )
J Chem Inf Model - Structural protein-ligand interaction fingerprints (SPLIF) for structure-based virtual screening: method and benchmark study. ( 0,822917568679043 )
J Chem Inf Model - Hydration properties of ligands and drugs in protein binding sites: tightly-bound, bridging water molecules and their effects and consequences on molecular design strategies. ( 0,822605773528578 )
J Chem Inf Model - Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance. ( 0,822535655028647 )
Comput Biol Chem - Docking assay of small molecule antivirals to p7 of HCV. ( 0,821970423252914 )
J Chem Inf Model - Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. ( 0,821804356545589 )
J Chem Inf Model - Protein-ligand docking using hamiltonian replica exchange simulations with soft core potentials. ( 0,821216530786147 )
J. Comput. Biol. - HarmonyDOCK: the structural analysis of poses in protein-ligand docking. ( 0,821102695618778 )
J Chem Inf Model - Correlating protein hot spot surface analysis using ProBiS with simulated free energies of protein-protein interfacial residues. ( 0,821076651781137 )
J Chem Inf Model - Current assessment of docking into GPCR crystal structures and homology models: successes, challenges, and guidelines. ( 0,8209363662751 )
J Chem Inf Model - Analyzing the topology of active sites: on the prediction of pockets and subpockets. ( 0,820764183686706 )
J Chem Inf Model - Structural basis of specific binding between Aurora A and TPX2 by molecular dynamics simulations. ( 0,820623472104613 )
J Chem Inf Model - Insight into the fundamental interactions between LEDGF binding site inhibitors and integrase combining docking and molecular dynamics simulations. ( 0,820335583815367 )
Comput. Biol. Med. - Theoretical study of 3-D molecular similarity and ligand binding modes of orthologous human and rat D2 dopamine receptors. ( 0,820144379848237 )
J Chem Inf Model - A contribution to the drug resistance mechanism of darunavir, amprenavir, indinavir, and saquinavir complexes with HIV-1 protease due to flap mutation I50V: a systematic MM-PBSA and thermodynamic integration study. ( 0,81925453410623 )
J Chem Inf Model - Construction and test of ligand decoy sets using MDock: community structure-activity resource benchmarks for binding mode prediction. ( 0,818953003273533 )
J Chem Inf Model - Conformational analysis of 6a- and 6?-naltrexol and derivatives and relationship to opioid receptor affinity. ( 0,818949632618886 )
J Chem Inf Model - Comparative binding effects of aspirin and anti-inflammatory Cu complex in the active site of LOX-1. ( 0,818543157200258 )
J Chem Inf Model - Automated docking with protein flexibility in the design of femtomolar click chemistry inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase. ( 0,818540731897979 )
J Chem Inf Model - Ligand-receptor affinities computed by an adapted linear interaction model for continuum electrostatics and by protein conformational averaging. ( 0,817985363760481 )
Comput Biol Chem - Computational simulation of ligand docking to L-type pyruvate kinase subunit. ( 0,817808434993174 )
J Chem Inf Model - Exploring inhibitor release pathways in histone deacetylases using random acceleration molecular dynamics simulations. ( 0,817795927937631 )
J Chem Inf Model - Using free energy of binding calculations to improve the accuracy of virtual screening predictions. ( 0,817708817143036 )
J Chem Inf Model - Accurate prediction of the bound form of the Akt pleckstrin homology domain using normal mode analysis to explore structural flexibility. ( 0,817515861112604 )
J Chem Inf Model - Approximating protein flexibility through dynamic pharmacophore models: application to fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). ( 0,81725951670694 )
J Chem Inf Model - Strategies to calculate water binding free energies in protein-ligand complexes. ( 0,817015300731366 )
J Chem Inf Model - The molecular basis for the selectivity of tadalafil toward phosphodiesterase 5 and 6: a modeling study. ( 0,816986053626126 )
J Chem Inf Model - Toward an optimal docking and free energy calculation scheme in ligand design with application to COX-1 inhibitors. ( 0,81635664295747 )
J Chem Inf Model - Implementation of the Hungarian algorithm to account for ligand symmetry and similarity in structure-based design. ( 0,816325479125981 )
J Chem Inf Model - Binding selectivity studies of phosphoinositide 3-kinases using free energy calculations. ( 0,816251228676238 )
Comput Biol Chem - Theoretical improvement of the specific inhibitor of human carbonic anhydrase VII. ( 0,815963686713729 )
J Chem Inf Model - Structural insights into the molecular basis of the ligand promiscuity. ( 0,815331586270011 )
J Chem Inf Model - GalaxyDock: protein-ligand docking with flexible protein side-chains. ( 0,815082487126934 )
J Chem Inf Model - Structure-based and multiple potential three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (SB-MP-3D-QSAR) for inhibitor design. ( 0,814875016199694 )
J Chem Inf Model - Exploring the role of water molecules for docking and receptor guided 3D-QSAR analysis of naphthyridine derivatives as spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitors. ( 0,814842179590169 )
J Chem Inf Model - MMGBSA as a tool to understand the binding affinities of filamin-peptide interactions. ( 0,814497711806205 )
J Chem Inf Model - Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations. ( 0,81423820824687 )
J Chem Inf Model - Investigation on the effect of key water molecules on docking performance in CSARdock exercise. ( 0,813301867260727 )
J Chem Inf Model - Dynamics of noncovalent interactions in all-a and all-? class proteins: implications for the stability of amyloid aggregates. ( 0,812703937120384 )
J Chem Inf Model - HotLig: a molecular surface-directed approach to scoring protein-ligand interactions. ( 0,811608823171846 )
J Chem Inf Model - Comparative study on the use of docking and Bayesian categorization to predict ligand binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) subtypes. ( 0,809796598630704 )
J Chem Inf Model - Molecular determinants of binding to the Plasmodium subtilisin-like protease 1. ( 0,809327322471777 )
Comput Biol Chem - Affinity of HIV-1 antibody 2G12 with monosaccharides: a theoretical study based on explicit and implicit water models. ( 0,807900089138794 )
J Chem Inf Model - Docking server for the identification of heparin binding sites on proteins. ( 0,807520261222043 )
J Chem Inf Model - Discovery of FDA-approved drugs as inhibitors of fatty acid binding protein 4 using molecular docking screening. ( 0,80708436361627 )
J Chem Inf Model - Analysis of factors influencing hydration site prediction based on molecular dynamics simulations. ( 0,80652196737411 )
J Chem Inf Model - Automated large-scale file preparation, docking, and scoring: evaluation of ITScore and STScore using the 2012 Community Structure-Activity Resource benchmark. ( 0,805645000289776 )
J Chem Inf Model - Steered molecular dynamics simulations for studying protein-ligand interaction in cyclin-dependent kinase 5. ( 0,804782764964275 )
J Chem Inf Model - Ligand-induced structural changes in TEM-1 probed by molecular dynamics and relative binding free energy calculations. ( 0,803969686881762 )